Veo 3.1 pricing (2026): API rates, Flow credits & cost

Runbo Li
Runbo Li
·
· 6 min read
Editorial illustration of Veo 3.1 video pricing inputs, duration, resolution and accepted-output cost

Quick answer

Veo 3.1 costs $0.05 to $0.60 per generated second in the Gemini API, depending on Lite, Fast or Standard and the output resolution. An eight-second successful generation therefore costs $0.40 to $4.80 at Google's listed API rates. Google Flow uses monthly credits instead of these dollar-per-second rates, so do not convert a Flow subscription into an API quote without the exact model and credit cost shown in the product.

Prices and access checked September 13, 2026 against Google's Gemini API pricing, Veo 3.1 API guide and Google AI plan comparison. Prices are USD before taxes, discounts or provider markups.

Veo 3.1 API pricing at a glance

Google Gemini API official pricing page screenshot (google-veo-pricing), September 25, 2026

Google Gemini API pricing page, captured September 25, 2026. Billing selection, currency and any promotion are shown in the screenshot; recheck the live page and checkout before buying. View official source

Variant

720p / 1080p

4K

Eight-second API example

Veo 3.1 Standard

$0.40/sec

$0.60/sec

$3.20 at 720p/1080p; $4.80 at 4K

Veo 3.1 Fast

$0.10 / $0.12 per sec

$0.30/sec

$0.80 at 720p; $0.96 at 1080p; $2.40 at 4K

Veo 3.1 Lite

$0.05 / $0.08 per sec

Not supported

$0.40 at 720p; $0.64 at 1080p

Google says the Gemini API charges only when a video is successfully generated. That does not mean every completed clip is usable. Budget for all charged attempts, then divide the relevant spend by accepted clips.

How much does one Veo 3.1 video cost?

For an eight-second Veo 3.1 request with native audio, multiply the selected Gemini API variant’s per-second rate by eight. Standard costs $3.20 at 720p or 1080p and $4.80 at 4K. Fast costs $0.80 at 720p, $0.96 at 1080p or $2.40 at 4K. Lite costs $0.40 at 720p or $0.64 at 1080p and does not support 4K. Eight seconds is the example here, not the only supported duration.

These figures are arithmetic from the listed rate, not an output-quality comparison. A cheaper attempt can cost more per accepted clip if it requires more retries or correction.

Choose duration and input before the cheapest rate

Google’s current Veo API parameter guide lists 4-, 6- and 8-second generation options, with eight seconds required for 1080p, 4K and supported reference-image requests. At 720p, a four-second request would cost $0.20 with Lite, $0.40 with Fast or $1.60 with Standard at the listed rates. Those are calculations, not tested results. Shorter output is useful only if it still covers the shot; Lite does not support referenceImages or video extension, so choose the necessary input controls before comparing rates.

Download approved API videos within two days. Google’s Veo guide says generated videos are stored on its server for two days before removal. Retrieve the completed file into your own storage before that window closes; an API result is not a permanent archive. Extended videos are treated as newly generated videos. This retention rule belongs to the Gemini API guide and should not be substituted for another provider’s storage policy.

Veo 3.1 Standard vs Fast vs Lite

  • Standard: use when its output and control tradeoffs justify the highest listed rate. It is $0.40 per second at 720p/1080p and $0.60 at 4K.

  • Fast: evaluate for a lower-cost iteration route. It is $0.10, $0.12 or $0.30 per second at 720p, 1080p or 4K.

  • Lite: evaluate when the lowest listed rate matters and 4K is unnecessary. It is $0.05 at 720p and $0.08 at 1080p.

Do not infer that the names alone establish a winner. Run the same brief, input assets, aspect ratio and review rubric across variants. Save every charged attempt and record which clips actually meet the deliverable.

Is Veo still Google's default video model?

Google's current Gemini API video overview recommends Gemini Omni Flash as the default for video generation and conversational editing. It directs users to Veo 3.1 for specific capabilities such as scene extension, last-frame control or legacy-pipeline integration. Veo remains available; it is no longer the only current Google video route.

That distinction matters when comparing prices. A Google AI plan may advertise video access through Gemini or Flow without promising that every request uses Veo 3.1. Check the selected model in the interface or API request.

How Google Flow pricing differs from the API

Google's current plan comparison lists 200 monthly Flow credits for Google AI Plus, 1,000 for Pro, 10,000 for the 5x Ultra tier and 25,000 for the 20x Ultra tier. The page does not expose one universal cash price in every locale, and the number of credits consumed depends on the selected Flow operation. Use the checkout price for your country and the credit quote shown before generation.

A Flow credit is not an API dollar and does not prove a fixed number of clips. Keep consumer-plan invoices, included storage and other benefits separate from an API unit-cost calculation.

A budget for accepted clips

Suppose you need twenty accepted eight-second clips. At one charged attempt per accepted clip, Veo 3.1 Fast at 720p would cost $16 in generation charges. At three charged attempts per accepted clip, the same sixty attempts would cost $48. Standard at 1080p would cost $64 at one attempt each or $192 at three.

The retry counts are scenarios, not measured success rates. Define acceptance before testing: subject identity, product accuracy, motion, camera, audio, text, continuity and legal-use requirements. Report the number of accepted clips and the total relevant spend.

Gemini API, Vertex AI and third-party providers

The Gemini Developer API price above is one purchasing surface. Vertex AI and third-party platforms can expose different model IDs, controls, regions, quotas, storage, support and rates. Quote the provider and interface beside the model name. Never copy Google's direct rate into a third-party invoice estimate.

Use our AI video pricing index for other direct examples and the AI video-generator comparison when the decision includes complete creator platforms rather than only model endpoints.

Test a current video model

Compare the models currently available in Magic Hour and check the live credit estimate before generating.

Explore AI models

How to compare Veo with another model

  • Choose five representative briefs, including the hardest subject, motion, camera and audio requirement.

  • Use the same source images, aspect ratio and acceptance rubric where the models support them.

  • Save model version, provider, settings, prompt, seed where available, output and charged amount for every attempt.

  • Count accepted outputs only after full-speed review at the intended delivery size.

  • Compare generation spend, review time, corrections and integration work per accepted clip.

You can also review the current Magic Hour model catalog or start a representative prompt in Text to Video. Availability and credit estimates can change by selected model, so verify the live picker before budgeting.

Frequently asked questions

In the Gemini API, Standard is $0.40 per second at 720p/1080p or $0.60 at 4K. Fast is $0.10, $0.12 or $0.30 per second at 720p, 1080p or 4K. Lite is $0.05 at 720p or $0.08 at 1080p and does not support 4K.

At listed Gemini API rates, $0.40-$4.80 for a successfully generated eight-second clip, depending on variant and resolution. Your accepted-clip cost can be higher after retries and corrections.

Google's pricing table does not list a free API tier for Veo 3.1. Consumer or promotional access through other Google products is a separate allowance and should not be described as free Gemini API usage.

Yes. Google's current Veo 3.1 API guide describes eight-second video with natively generated audio. Validate dialogue, music and sound effects as part of the accepted-output review.

Google currently recommends Omni Flash as its default Gemini API video model and Veo 3.1 for scene extension, last-frame control or legacy integration. Test the required workflow and current price rather than choosing from model name alone.

Runbo Li
Runbo Li
CEO of Magic Hour
Runbo Li is the Co-founder and CEO of Magic Hour, where he builds AI video and image tools for content creation. He is a Y Combinator W24 founder and former Data Scientist at Meta, where he worked on 0-1 consumer social products in New Product Experimentation. He writes about AI video generation, AI image creation, creative workflows, and creator tools.
View author →

Continue Reading

Editorial comparison of five AI video production routes using storyboards, references, audio, editing and effects

5 best Veo 3 alternatives: video, audio and costs

5 best Veo 3 alternatives: video, audio and costs
veo3

Google Veo 3.1: a beginner's guide to AI video

Google Veo 3.1: a beginner's guide to AI video
Editorial comparison of Seedance 2.5 multimodal references and Google Veo 3.1 cinematic video workflows

Seedance 2.5 vs Veo 3.1: duration, controls, audio & cost

Seedance 2.5 vs Veo 3.1: duration, controls, audio & cost
Kling 3.0 vs Veo 3.1 AI video model comparison showing cinematic video generation and motion quality differences

Kling 3.0 vs Veo 3.1 (2026): controls, audio & API cost

Kling 3.0 vs Veo 3.1 (2026): controls, audio & API cost
Editorial triptych comparing Veo 3.1, Kling 3.0 and PixVerse V6 video workflows

Veo 3.1 vs Kling 3.0 vs PixVerse V6: which video model?

Veo 3.1 vs Kling 3.0 vs PixVerse V6: which video model?
Veo 3.1 vs Sora 2 - a cinematic clash of next-gen AI video creation tools redefining visual storytelling

Sora 2 vs Veo 3.1: availability, features, API and price

Sora 2 vs Veo 3.1: availability, features, API and price